Gee I thought
God appointed
George? 
What a legacy.
WWI, Samuel Bush - traded and armed both sides.
WWII - Prescott Bush traded with and armed
Hitler throughout WWII. The
U.S. National Archives has released the data of the
Bush family involvement in directly benefiting from the slave labor of
Auschwitz concentration camp. During this
Bush's reign, he and the
Vatican RAT Line smuggled out
Nazi Gestapo chiefs like
Gehlen who then went to work for the
USA fighting "communists" (anyone who wants a REAL democracy).
Poppy (George H.W.) Bush ran the
CIA (Criminals in Action, more commonly referred to as the
Central Intelligence Agency of the USA) and terrorized
South America, so much so that their
guerrillas and American air power managed to destroy the country of
Nicaragua. When instructed by the
WORLD COURT to rebuild that country
Poppy made sure
George Jr. pulled the
USA from
International Court, after much bull put forth by the
GOP owned media that
International Court would just be ridiculous ...I mean
Americans might actually be forced to obey the law. Since this bunch do not obey the laws of their own country one can hardly imagine them obeying
WORLD COURT. All of this information is available in the US National Archives and has been for a few years now.
So why isn't mainstream media covering
Hillary's connection to the vast right wing conspiracy? Why is there no coverage of "
The Fellowship", "
The Family" ....the National Prayer Breakfast (of the secular government?) Why has there been no coverage of the shadowy
Douglas Coe, who claims the leaders of
America are appointed by
GOD and thus need to understand their divine calling ...which apparently can only be recognized through their group.
This
Sunday morning the corporate owned media is doing their level best to whip up a great divide in the Democratic party and distract from
Scott McClellan's book, wherein
he states that the
Bush administration LIED to go to war., so he could establish himself as a great war time leader.
i.e. In an
OP Ed column
Frank Rich had this to say....
June 1, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
McCain’s McClellan Nightmare
By
FRANK RICHTHEY thought they were being so slick. When the
McCain campaign
abruptly moved last Tuesday’s fund-raiser with
President Bush from the
Phoenix Convention Center to a private home, it was the next best thing to sending the loathed lame duck into the witness protection program.
John McCain and
Mr. Bush were caught on camera together for a mere 26 seconds, and at 9 p.m. Eastern time, safely after the networks’ evening newscasts. The two men’s furtive encounter on the
Phoenix airport tarmac, as captured by a shaky, inaudible long shot
on FoxNews.com, could have been culled from a surveillance video.
But for the
McCain campaign, any
“Mission Accomplished” high-fives had to be put on hold. That same evening
Politico.com broke the news of
Scott McClellan’s memoir, and it was soon
All Bush All the Time in the
mediasphere. Or more to the point:
All Iraq All the Time, for the deceitful origins of the war in
Iraq are the major focus of the former press secretary’s tell-all.
... In the woe-is-us analyses by leading
Republicans about their party’s travails — whether by the
House G.O.P. leader John Boehner (in
The Wall Street Journal) or the media strategist
Alex Castellanos (in
National Review) —
Iraq is conspicuous by its utter absence. The
Republican brand’s crisis is instead blamed exclusively on excessive spending, scandal and earmarks — it’s all the fault of
Tom DeLay’s K Street Project, Jack Abramoff and that Alaskan “bridge to nowhere.” ...This transcends denial; it’s group psychosis. Nowhere is this syndrome more apparent than in the profuse punditry of
Karl Rove, who never cites
Iraq as a problem for
Mr. McCain (if he refers to it at all) and flatly assured
George Stephanopoulos last Sunday that
Mr. McCain has no need to make a “clean break” from
Mr. Bush.Mr. Rove is to the
McCain campaign what
Bill Clinton was to the
Hillary Clinton campaign: a ubiquitous albatross dispensing dubious, out-of-date political advice and constantly upstaging the candidate he ostensibly supports. Like
Mr. Clinton,
Mr. Rove is a camera hog who puts his need to vehemently defend his own administration’s record ahead of all else. So what if he’s
under subpoena by the
House Judiciary Committee? He
doesn’t care if he reminds voters of administration scandals or of
Mr. McCain’s association with
Iraq any more than
Mr. Clinton cared if he reminded voters of his continued ties to suspect financial donors and the prospect of an out-of-control co-presidency.
Damaging as
Mr. Clinton’s behavior was to his wife’s campaign
, Iraq was worse.
Mrs. Clinton could never credibly explain away her vote
authorizing the war. Her repeated disingenuous attempts to fudge it ended up contaminating her credibility on other issues.
Mr. McCain’s record on
Iraq is far worse than
Mrs. Clinton’s. He
didn’t just cast a vote but was a
drumbeater for the propaganda
Mr. McClellan cites, including the
neocon fantasies of a newly democratic
Middle East. On
“Hardball” and “
Meet the Press” in March 2003,
Mr. McCain invoked that argument, along with the promise that
Americans would be “welcomed as liberators,” to assert the war would be “one of the best things that’s happened to
America.”
To cover up these poor judgments now — and questionable actions, including his
public boosting of
Ahmad Chalabi, then a lobbying client of the current
McCain campaign guru,
Charles Black — Mr. McCain is hoping that the “liberal media” will once again be complicit enablers. We’ll see. He’s also counting on the press to let him blur his record by accentuating his subsequent criticism of the war’s execution — as if the war’s execution (also criticized by countless
Democrats), not its conception, was the fatal error.
His other tactic is to try to create a smoke screen by smearing
Barack Obama as unpatriotic.
Mr. McCain has suggested that the
Democratic front-runner is the
Hamas candidate and has
piled on to
Mr. Bush’s effort to slur
Mr. Obama as an apostle of “appeasement.” A
campaign ad presented
Mr. McCain as “the
American president
Americans have been waiting for” (not to be confused, presumably, with the
un-American president
Al Qaeda has been waiting for).
Now
Mr. McCain is
chastising Mr. Obama for not having visited
Iraq since 2006 — a questionable strategy, you’d think, given that
Mr. McCain’s own
propagandistic visit to a “safe”
Baghdad market is one of his biggest embarrassments. Then again, in his frantic efforts to explain why he sided with
Mr. Bush to oppose an expanded
G.I. bill that the
Senate passed by 75 to 22,
Mr. McCain has attacked
Mr. Obama for
not enlisting in the military.
Besides making
Mr. McCain look ever angrier next to his serene opponent, this eruption raises the question of why he chose double-standard partisanship over principle by not applying this criterion to the blunderers who took us into
Iraq. Unlike
Mr. Obama, who was 7 years old in 1968,
Mr. Bush and company could have served in
Vietnam as
Mr. McCain did.
The
McCain campaign may have no choice but to double down on
Iraq — what other issue does the candidate have? — but it can’t count on smear tactics or journalistic and public amnesia to indefinitely enforce the
McCain narrative. As the
McClellan circus shows, unexpected bombshells will keep intervening — detonating not only on the ground in
Iraq but also in
Washington, where more
Bush alumni with reputations to salvage may yet run for cover about what went down in 2002-3.
As
F. Scott Fitzgerald would have it, we will be borne back ceaselessly into the past. Or so we will be as long as
Americans continue to die in
Iraq and as long as politicians like
Mr. Bush,
Mr. McCain and
Mrs. Clinton refuse to accept responsibility for their roles, major and minor, in abetting this national tragedy.
...
I think we can each hold ourselves accountable by making a commitment to be awake, to refuse a
stupefied innocence brought on by no real news of the world, to be aware of what is happening and to face it all with an open mind and heart. Today we must work to get to the truth because we are surrounded by a media embedded and complicit with a criminal government. A media who thinks it is funny ..never seeing the tragedy in their own paid off punditry.
ALL the things we accused
NAZI Germany of doing they did under the complicity of the
Bush family and large parts of
American industry.
It is a fact, and well documented.
We must face this history and deal with it or have it repeated endlessly....while we plead innocence.
So perhaps before this criminal clan bombs Iran back to the 16
th century we could look at who armed
Iran in the first place? Wasn't it a mere two years ago that
Halliburton finally stopped trading with
Iran?
Oh George, how can I ever quit you. How on earth did you manage to take a country from democracy to fascism in six years (without a lot of help from a criminally complicit congress and media). 
