Thursday, September 14, 2006

Treason Inc.

Bush Junta Complicity in 9/11

Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, a longtime Army intelligence officer, publicly claimed on August 15, 2005 that the 9/11 committee investigation was a cover-up. "Shaffer said that his unit had contacted the FBI repeatedly during 2000 to warn that a US-based terrorist cell was at work, but three times was forced to cancel meetings to brief the FBI at the instruction of the Strategic Operations Command (SOCOM), the Pentagon unit in charge of all counter-terrorism work."

"There is only one politically serious explanation of this now-indisputable fact: powerful forces within the US military/intelligence complex wanted a terrorist incident on US soil in order to create the needed shift in public opinion required to embark on a long-planned campaign of military intervention in Central Asia and the Middle East. Whether or not they knew the scale of the impending attacks and what the precise targets would be, they acted in such a way as to block the arrest of known terrorist operatives and allow them to carry out their plot."
On August 9, 2005, a front page article in the New York Times revealed that a military intelligence unit had identified four September 11 hijackers as Al Qaeda operatives working in the US a year before the 9/11 attacks. A former intelligence officer in the Pentagon unit named Able Danger indicated that the intelligence unit was prevented by the military’s Special Operations Command from passing on the information to the FBI.

Why was this information concealed?

"Because it points imperiously to the existence of a conspiracy within one or another intelligence or security agency, not to mention the Bush White House, to shield the future hijackers and allow some form of terrorist attack on US soil to occur. All of the efforts of the 9/11 commission—as well as the entire official media and both the Democratic and Republican parties—have been concentrated on excluding even the possibility that something more sinister than bureaucratic incompetence or institutional roadblocks were responsible for an intelligence failure of staggering dimensions.

"But the evidence pointing to some form of government complicity continues to mount, despite official whitewashes, cover-ups, half-truths and lies."
"A report released June 9, 2005 by the FBI’s Office of the Inspector General raises new questions about the role of the US government in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The internal FBI study provides several important revelations about how US intelligence agencies ignored and even suppressed warnings in the period leading up to the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that killed nearly 3,000 people."
June 13, 2005: "A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus' and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the and is now pNational Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas rofessor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, 'If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling.' Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, 'It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building ...
7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings.'

Gore Vidal's essay 'The Enemy Within' was published on October 27, 2002 in the print edition of The Observer. In it Vidal claims that what he calls a "Bush junta" planned and carried out the terrorist attacks as a pretext to enact a pre-existing agenda to invade Afghanistan and attack civil liberties in the U.S.
"We still don't know by whom we were struck that infamous Tuesday, or for what true purpose. But it is fairly plain to many civil libertarians that 9/11 put paid not only to much of our fragile Bill of Rights but also to our once-envied system of government which had taken a mortal blow the previous year when the Supreme Court did a little dance in 5/4 time and replaced a popularly elected President with the oil and gas Bush-Cheney junta."
This treasonous travesty of justice is "protecting us" by promising another terrorist attack if you vote Democrat - not that that vote would make much difference given the corporate coup that owns both parties.

The people MUST stand - the price for democracy IS eternal vigilance and the World is in peril. In Canada we have a Prime Minister who created a slush fund for Bush's personal use, with part of the softwood lumber deal. A mere $450 MILLION dollar SLUSH fund making Liberal larceny look like small peanuts, except that our once Liberal Prime Minister Martin also signed a signed a deal melding Canada with the USA and Mexico. Amazingly, only Lou Dobbs at CNN has highlighted this fact in the mainstream media, a criminally negligent position on the part of our news media given that NONE of these leaders passed this deal past the elected representatoives of the government.

They operate above the law and beneath contempt, using the trust of office to sanction their criminal behavior. A criminal congress could not hold them accountable, can a passive body called parliament, rein in Herr Harper, or is our elected body of representatives as lame as the USA?

Our countries were signed away by three white guys in suits, who think they are entitled enough to commit treason, start illegal wars and institute slavery in the name of a dubious deceitful, democracy where the voting system is suspect. If there is a justice system in the USA they had best act soon, or just change the name of the White House, to the Bada Bing.

From Darfur to the Phillipines, to Iraq and Iran, the genocide goes on, WHEN will you stand, for your country, for your children, for your personal intregrity?

"Your silence will not protect you." Audre Lourde, lesbian, feminist, poet, and a woman of color who stood for all humanity.


Post a Comment

<< Home