Thursday, October 18, 2007

Terror, Made in the USA - 911 Redux?

The Case For Impeachment (the book)

Authors (Lindorff and Olshansky) believe that articles of impeachment in the book should be an open and shut case, that a prosecutor would have no problem drawing up eg. a FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) indictment, or convincing a jury to convict - if this were a regular criminal matter. They go on to assert that the only possible explanation for President Bush's conditions for appearing before the 9/11 Commission (no reporters, recording devices or notes; that he not be placed under oath; that only a few select members be present) is that he lied. Further, Bush's lies on Iraq have killed over 2,500 troops and an estimated 100,000 Iraqis (mostly civilians), and has cost hundreds of billions. Other charges include violation of signed international treaties that have become the law of the land (eg. Geneva Convention), ignoring or violating acts of Congress through the issuance of "signing statements" in which Bush declared his intention to interpret laws his own way and obey only those he feels like. "The Case for Impeachment" then reviews Bush's early record of business failures, early abuses of law as Texas' governor and resolving the contested Florida votes in 2000, and his administration's emphasis on secrecy, followed by background material on impeachment.
Specific charges against President Bush include negligence (ignoring global warming, Katrina foul-ups, no plan or sufficient armor in Iraq, and poor defense of the U.S.), corruption (restricting Iraq bidding to a few U.S. firms, involvement with Abramoff), and illegal acts (authorizing torture, wiretapping, lying about the need to invade Iraq). The authors also believe that other officials should be impeached: V.P. Cheney (awarding contracts to cronies, support for torture, outing Valerie Plame), Secretary Rumsfeld (supporting torture), Rice (lying about the potential use of aluminum tubes), A.G. Gonzales (lying about warrantless surveillance). Lindorff and Olshansky realize no impeachment action will occur under the current Congress - however, they believe setting out the case for doing so will give proponents something to work towards and help bring about political change. Their "bottom-line" is that failure to act may reduce the Constitution to but a piece of paper(done) by the end of Bush's second term. ...

The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, and After the Attack
By Arabesque
August 2, 2007
Updated: October 16, 2007
“The whole mystique of intelligence is that you acquire this… very valuable information covertly… if truth be told, about 80%—eight, zero—of any of the information that one needs is available in open source materials.”
[1] Ray McGovern, 27-year CIA analyst in the film 9/11: Press for Truth

Note: See Kennebunkport Warning Controversy


The Iraq/Al-Qaeda Disinformation
National Intelligence Estimate
Fake Warnings
Our Pals, Al Qaeda
The Iraq “Weapons of Mass Destruction” Hoax
Predictions of a “New 9/11” before November 2007
Vacuous Fear Mongering
Reactions to the Warnings
Motive for the Next 9/11? 2008 Elections, Oil, Iran, Continuity of Government, Civil Liberties, and Power
The “Terrorist Contingency Plan” to Strike Iran—Before it Happens?
The Iran Agenda: The US Administration Wants Another War, Possibly Nuclear
US Administration Declares Iran’s Army a “terrorist” organization
The Iran/Iraq Disinformation
The Iraq Quagmire
There will be Another “Terrorist” Attack, whether it’s “Manufactured or Real”?
With “Government Officials” like These, Who Needs “Terrorists”?
A “New 9/11” Will Create a “Dictatorial Police State” and Result in Cancelled Elections
Posse Comitatus Law and Martial Law
Continuity of Government after the “new 9/11”?
National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive
After the “New 9/11”?
What Does it All Mean?
What Can Be Done to Stop Another 9/11? Impeachment

This is a wake-up call that we are about to experience another 9/11-WMD experience. The wake-up call is unlikely to be effective…“Security operatives, such as Michael Chertoff , and various instruments of administration propaganda have warned that we will be attacked before next year's election. Chertoff is not a person who wants to be known as Chicken Little for telling us that the sky is falling.
Bush has the Republican Party in such a mess that it cannot survive without another 9/11. Whether authentic or orchestrated, an attack will activate Bush's new executive orders, which create a dictatorial police state in event of ‘national emergency.’[118] Craig Paul Roberts, July 20, 2007

“It is time to think about the "unthinkable." The Bush Administration has both the inclination and the power to cancel the 2008 election… The real question is not how or when they might do it. It's how, realistically, we can stop them… What's also clear is that this administration has a deep, profound and uncompromised contempt for democracy, for the rule of law, and for the US Constitution. When George W. Bush went on the record (twice) as saying he has nothing against dictatorship, as long as he can be dictator, it was a clear and present policy statement. Who really believes this crew will walk quietly away from power? They have the motivation, the money and the method for doing away with the electoral process altogether. So why wouldn't they? …Today we must ask: who would stop this administration from taking dictatorial power in the instance of a "national emergency" such as a terror attack at a nuclear power plant or something similar?”[119] Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis, July 30, 2007
“[Congressman John Oliver] is deeply concerned whether we will actually have an election in Nov. '08, as he believes this administration will likely strike Iran from the air, declare a national emergency, and cancel the '08 elections.[120] Bob Feuer, July 5, 2007

“A lot has happened over the past two years, most of it aimed at amassing greater power for the government while undermining the rights of American citizens… President Bush quietly claimed the authority to allow government agents to open the private mail of American citizens, proclaimed his right to assume control of the federal government following a ‘catastrophic emergency,’ and assumed the power to declare martial law and use the military as a domestic police force in response to a natural disaster, disease outbreak, terrorist attack or any ‘other condition.’”[121] John W. Whitehead, August 4, 2007
Every would-be dictator claims that his authoritarian measures are taken to ensure national security. Everything else must be sacrificed, including democratic rights. This is the basic line that has been utilized by the government since 9/11 to lay siege to constitutionally protected democratic rights, in the name of the ‘war on terror.’”[122] Joe Kay, July 16, 2007
“A Pastor has come forward to blow the whistle on a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to ‘obey the government’ in preparation for a declaration of martial law, property and firearm seizures, and forced relocation.”[123] Prison Planet, May 24, 2006
“Could martial law ever become a reality in America? Some fear any nuclear, biological or chemical attack on U.S. soil might trigger just that. KSLA News 12 has discovered that the clergy would help the government with potentially their biggest problem: Us.”[124] KSLA News 12, August 23, 2007
Posse Comitatus Law and Martial Law
“In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law
(1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President’s ability to deploy troops within the United States. The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.”[125] Frank Morales, October 27, 2006
“Members of the 1st Battalion 265 Air Defense Artillery have mobilized and are on a plane headed first to Ft. Bliss, then for federal active duty in the capital region. The troops will be deployed for a year… They are ordered by the president to the nation’s capital.”[126] News, August 22, 2007
Continuity of Government after the “new 9/11”?
“If the Bush administration wanted to fuel conspiracy theories about its classified plan for maintaining governmental control in the wake of an apocalyptic terror attack, it could not have come up with a better strategy than refusing to let Congressman Peter DeFazio examine it… DeFazio received word that his request had been denied. Through Homeland Security Committee staffers, he learned the White House had initially granted his request, but that it later was rejected. There was no explanation of why—and no word about who made the final decision… DeFazio has such clearance and has used it numerous times to gain access to sensitive materials. Until Wednesday, he had never been denied permission.[127] A Register-Guard Editorial, July 23, 2007
"It is important to keep in mind that much of the information related to the continuity of government is highly sensitive.”[128] Bush administration spokesman Trey Bohn, July 23, 2007
“I just can't believe they're going to deny a member of Congress the right of reviewing how they plan to conduct the government of the United States after a significant terrorist attackWe're talking about the continuity of the government of the United States of America. I would think that would be relevant to any member of Congress, let alone a member of the Homeland Security Committee… Maybe the people who think there's a conspiracy out there are right.”[129] Peter DeFazio, July 24, 2007
“Is there any doubt that the Bush administration, and its dead-ender allies in the Republican Party and the media, will use an act of domestic terrorism as a fresh opportunity to further demonize their political opponents and further compromise the Constitution? Will they truly be able to resist the temptations of martial law, emergency powers, and the phony prerogatives of the unitary executive in wartime? …I would worry less about the possibility of terrorism, and more about the probability that the same chickenhawks who exploited it before to sell us on war without end, will exploit it again to sing the virtues of temporary fascism.”[130] Marty Kaplan, July 29, 2007
National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive
“’Catastrophic Emergency’ means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions… The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government.”[131] National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, May 9, 2007
“This is nothing more than a power grab that centralizes power and will make the President a dictator in the case of a so called ‘Catastrophic Emergency’. It is insane that this directive claims that its purpose is to define procedures to protect a working constitutional government when the very language in the document destroys what a working constitutional government is supposed to be. A working constitutional government contains a separation of powers between three equally powerful branches and this directive states that the executive branch has the power to coordinate the activities of the other branches. This directive is a clear violation of constitutional separation of powers.”[132] Lee Rogers, May 21, 2007
“This directive, completely unnoticed by the media, and given no scrutiny by Congress, literally gives the White House unprecedented dictatorial power over the government and the country, bypassing the US Congress and obliterating the separation of powers.”[133] Larry Chin, May 21, 2007
Bush may now declare himself absolute ruler at any moment and Congress can like it or lump it. Naturally, this act of betrayal is of so little importance and consequence, the corporate media believes you are better served knowing Justin Timberlake is in love.”[134] Kurt Nimmo, May 30, 2007
After the “New 9/11”?
“We’ve got a man who’s proclaimed himself dictator right now. We’ve got a constitutional crisis. If we go three years shying away from that subject because it isn’t popular… to mention; that our president is not only committing crimes, and violating the constitution, but he’s proclaiming his right to do it! We’re in a situation like Germany [before WWII]… because the next 9/11 is going to be our Reichstag fire. The day after it, our freedoms are gone.”[135] Daniel Ellsberg, June 9, 2006
What Does it All Mean?
“Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these [the rights of the population], it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness… [W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”[136] Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
“Getting U.S. militarism back to a level of incontestable, integral ideological hegemony has been a long sought goal that appeared well in reach after 9/11. The shock and awe unleashed on Iraq in 2003 was to restore U.S. militarism as the premier ideological construct. Behind this construct U.S. power could fluidly unfold, as the world’s only superpower demonstrated that no form of nationalist defiance would go unpunished. A new era of neoliberal militarism was consolidating, according to the architects of the new model—Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Pearle, Douglas Feith, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld (among others)… The bellicose architects and their many supporters in the Senate and House of Representatives—many dumbstruck by 9/11—could count on the money, allegiance, enthusiasm, trust, (press-led) jingoism, and short attention span of the U.S. citizenry.”[137] James M. Cypher, June 2007
“Americans think their danger is terrorists. They don't understand the terrorists cannot take away habeas corpus, the Bill of Rights, the Constitution…The terrorists are not anything like the threat that we face to the Bill of Rights and the Constitution from our own government in the name of fighting terrorism. Americans just aren't able to perceive that."[138] Paul Craig Roberts, July 19, 2007
“There is a new enemy stalking the United States. No one can say what it is. Some call it uncertainty. We call it You Never Know. We know You Never Know is dangerous, but it is hard to say how dangerous. That is the problem. You never know. You Never Know is a powerful enemy. It cannot be defeated. Think you have a handle on uncertainty? Are you sure? You never know. Planning against You Never Know is difficult. What weapons do you buy to fight it? What organizations do you fund? What plans do you make? The answer tends to be whatever you already have. That is the catch. You Never Know is phony. It is an antidote for another threat: the threat of no threats. The threat of no threats is not a threat to most of us, who are glad to go unthreatened. But no threats is a threat to those who work to protect us from threats, the military services, defense contractors, defense think tanks, Congress, foreign policy pundits, even security studies programs. Without plausible threats to worry us, they champion merely possible ones by saying, essentially, ‘You never know’… The dirty secret of American national security politics is that we are safe. Americans might be the most secure people in history. But we worry. We are told that our enemies may be organizing our destruction in pockets of disorder, which are growing. We are taught that the world is chaotic, awash in civil war and terrorism, which could strike us ‘any place, with virtually any weapon.’ We hear that our satellites are ripe for attack, that pirates prey on our shipping, that Iran’s nuclear weapons portend disaster, and that China is a growing threat. At base, however, most arguments claiming America’s insecurity rely on implausible scenarios. The futures these arguments fear are not probable but possible. It is possibility that justifies the defenses they advocate.”[139] You Never Know(ism), Benjamin H. Friedman and Harvey M. Sapolsky, Spring 2006
“The threat of an impending 9/11 type attack by ‘Islamic terrorists’ is a fabrication, extensive media propaganda, supported by covert intelligence operations…[140] Behind this diabolical ‘catastrophic emergency’ scenario… is a profit driven war… The Wall Street financial establishment, the military-industrial complex, led by Lockheed Martin, the big five weapons and aerospace defense contractors, the Texas oil giants and energy conglomerates, the construction and engineering and public utility companies not to mention the biotechnology conglomerates, are indelibly behind this militarization of America… The spiraling multibillion dollar ‘defense’ budget, which according to independent estimates has reached the trillion dollar mark… is barely acknowledged, nor is the privatization of war itself. Known and documented, the "Islamic terror network" is a creation of the US intelligence apparatus. The ‘war on terrorism’ is bogus. The 911 narrative as conveyed by the 911 Commission report is fabricated. The Bush administration is involved in acts of cover-up and complicity at the highest levels of government. Revealing the lies behind 911 would serve to undermine the legitimacy of the "global war on terrorism" which constitutes the main justification for waging war in the Middle East. Without 911, the war criminals in high office do not have a leg to stand on. Their entire National Security construct collapses like a deck of cards.”[141] University of Ottawa Professor of Economics, Michel Chossudovsky, August 10, 2007
The vice president is the single greatest threat to American and international security in the world today. Not Osama Bin Laden. Not the ghost of Saddam Hussein. Not Ahmadinejad or Kim Jung Il. Not al-Qaida, the Taliban, or Jose Padilla himself. Not even George W. Bush can lay claim to this title… Operating in a never-never land of constitutional ambiguity which exists between the office of the president and the Congress of the United States, Cheney’s office has made its impact felt on the policies of the United States of America as had no vice president’s office before him. Granted unprecedented oversight over national security and foreign policy by executive order in early 2001, many months prior to the terror attacks of 9/11, Cheney has single-handedly steered America away from being a nation among nations (albeit superior), operating (roughly) in accordance with the rule of law, and toward its present manifestation as the new Rome, a decadent imperial power bent on global domination whatever the cost…The nonsensical response to the terror attacks of 9/11, seeking a ‘global war’ versus defending the rule of law at home and abroad, taking the lead in spreading the lies that got us involved in Iraq, legitimizing torture as a tool of American jurisprudence, advocating for warrantless wiretappings of U.S.-based communications (regardless of what the Fourth Amendment says against illegal search and seizure), and pushing for an expansion of America’s global conflict into Iran—all can be traced back to the person of Cheney as the point of origin. America today is very much engaged in a life-or-death struggle against the forces of evil. The enemy resides not abroad, however, but at home, vested in the highest offices of the land. Neither Osama Bin Laden nor Saddam Hussein threatened the life blood of the United States—the Constitution—to the extent that Cheney has. Not Hitler, Stalin, Mao or Ho Chi Minh. Not since the American Civil War has there been a constitutional crisis of the magnitude that exists today, threatening to rip the very fabric of American society apart at the seams, courtesy of Dick Cheney. That Congress today remains relatively mute on this crisis is one of the great mysteries of our time.”[142] Scott Ritter, August 21, 2007
What Can Be Done to Stop Another 9/11? Impeachment
“Nearly half of the US public wants President George W. Bush to face impeachment, and even more favor that fate for Vice President Dick Cheney, according to a poll out Friday. The survey by the American Research Group found that 45 percent support the US House of Representatives beginning impeachment proceedings against Bush, with 46 percent opposed, and a 54-40 split in favor when it comes to Cheney.”[143]
“Dick Cheney is impeachable for his overweening power and his sneering contempt of the Constitution and the rule of law.”[144] Constitutional Lawyer Bruce Fein, June 27, 2007
“More than 200 years later, we have another King George. In the last six years, George W. Bush has sought to accumulate all governing powers in the same hands -- his. In the Declaration of Independence, the framers charged that the King ‘refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.’ Bush has repeatedly violated the Constitution's command that the President ‘shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,’ by breaking some and refusing to enforce others. The Constitution grants Congress the power to make laws; after both houses pass a bill, the President can only sign it or veto it. Bush, however, takes a different tack. He has vetoed just three bills, then quietly attached ‘signing statements’ to more than 1,000 congressional laws, indicating his intent to follow only those parts with which he agrees.”[145] President of the National Lawyers Guild, Marjorie Cohn, July 16, 2007
“The second censure resolution addresses the administration's repeated assaults on the rule of law. The President and the attorney general have disregarded and violated statutes, treaties and the Constitution in their drive to consolidate more and more power in the executive branch. Among the abuses of the rule of law that the censure resolution will condemn are the administration's illegal warrantless wiretapping program, its interrogation policy and justifications for the use of torture, its extreme positions on the legal status of detainees that have been repeatedly rejected by the Supreme Court, and its refusal to recognize and cooperate with Congress' constitutional responsibility to conduct oversight.”[146] Sen. Russ Feingold, Congress has a duty to censure President for his abuses of power, August 14, 2007
“Bush and Cheney would have been impeached long ago if Congress was carrying out the will of We the People, especially since last November. By taking impeachment "off the table", Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic power structure are abetting the formation of dictatorship and the shredding of the Constitution. Why is this happening? The answer can be summed up in two words: "Corporate Personhood". Ever since the late 19th century, clever corporate lawyers have been gaining the rights and privileges of persons for the fictitious persons that are corporations.”[147] Carol Wolman, August 13, 2007
“The reality of Vice President Dick Cheney’s unprecedented, awesome and totally illegal power and authority over the people of America, the United States Congress, the Supreme Court, and all bureaus and agencies of American government, serves not only to invalidate totally the Constitution and the very founding of the United States, but proves correct as well the fears the Founders voiced when recognizing the threat of political parties… There is absolutely no other way of dealing with this American domestic and massive international crime wave than by the immediate and total impeachment of both Vice President Richard Cheney and President George Bush.”[148] Ted Lang, July 26, 2007
“There is an orderly remedy written into the Constitution aimed at preventing a president from usurping the power of the people and acting like a king; the process, of course, is impeachment… With impeachment under way, such senior officers might be reminded that all officers and national security officials swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States—NOT to protect and defend the president.”[149] Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, July 27, 2007
“Serious critics of both Mr. Bush and the Democrats ask why the latter do not undertake the impeachment of the former… If one takes the trouble to examine the matter from the perspective of the machinations that dominate all political behavior… though Republicans and Democrats have their personal and minor policy differences, they are in agreement on one basic point: their ‘bipartisan’ support for the preservation and aggrandizement of the power of the state. They understand – as do members of the mainstream media – that their principal obligation is to serve the well-being of the political power structure that long ago laid uncontested claim to the ownership of modern society.”[150] Butler Shaffer, July 17, 2007
There are many predictions for a new 9/11,[151] but how can we stop it? Reveal the truth about the first 9/11[152] and call for impeachment.
9/11 Press for Truth
“We owe the truth to the victims, survivors and those affected by 9/11… I lost 200 friends on 9/11—two hundred people who don’t have the ability to call for the truth. They don’t have a voice. I’m alive because of a miracle… When I started asking questions, they all went the other way… I don’t care about anything else—I want the truth… Please stand up, take it upon yourself to ask real questions and make a change. We need activism. We need you to ask those people in power to tell you what really happened. They have an agenda. They have used our tragedy to create this world ‘war on terrorism’ which is just a fallacy. Everybody else in the world is more prepared and have more information about 9/11 than we do. Get the facts.”[153] 9/11 Survivor William Rodriguez
[1] watch the movie here: see 30:00 mark for quote by McGovern. See also:
Ray McGovern, George W. Bush: A CIA Analysis,, August 22, 2007
“The craft of CIA analysis was designed to be an all-source operation, meaning that we analysts were responsible – and held accountable – for assimilating information from all sources and coming to judgments on what it all meant. We used information of all kinds, from the most sophisticated technical collection platforms to spies to open media. Here I have to reveal a trade secret, which punctures the mystique of intelligence analysis. Generally speaking, 80 percent of the information one needs to form judgments on key intelligence targets or issues is available in open media. It helps to have training from past masters of media analysis, which began in a structured way in targeting Japanese and German media in the 1940s. But, truth be told, everyone with a high-school education can do it. It is not rocket science.”
[2] Ron Suskind, Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush, New York Times, October 17, 2004. See also:
Rosa Brooks, A Really Bad Case of Neocon Reality,, July 20, 2007:
“So it's understandable that many administration critics now conclude, with some satisfaction, that the neocon conception of how ‘reality’ works has been permanently discredited. If empires can choose to create their own realities, why hasn't Bush's American Empire created a stable, more peaceful world? Why aren't we safer than we were before 9/11? The neocons deluded themselves into imagining they could control reality, but in the end, aren't they the ones who've just been mugged?”
[3] Kenneth T. Walsh, How the scars of public life shaped the vice president's unyielding view of executive power,, January 15, 2006
[4] Sen. Robert Byrd, My Letter to President Bush,, July 19, 2007. See also:
Robert Scheer, Is Al Qaeda Just a Bush Boogeyman? Los Angeles Times, January 11, 2005, keyword search: ‘Bush "Al Qaeda"’ gives 4,320,000 links as of August 9, 2007.
[5] Mike Glover, Thompson campaign bus rumbles through rural Iowa,, September 7, 2007
[6] Dan Eggen, No Evidence Connecting Iraq to Al Qaeda, 9/11 Panel Says, Washington Post, June 16, 2004
[7] John Amato, Bush says: ‘Iraq Had ‘Nothing’ To Do With 9/11’, August 21st, 2006
[8] Associated Press, Pentagon: No Saddam-Al Qaeda Link: Meanwhile, Cheney Repeats Assertions Of Terror Group's Ties In Iraq,, April 6, 2007
[9] Nick Juliano, Bush: Insurgents in Iraq same as 9/11 attackers,, July 12, 2007
[10] Jason Stahl, Who is the enemy? Who exactly the United States is fighting in Iraq and why it matters,, July 18, 2007
[11] Carolyn O'Hara, Bill Kristol's fantasy forest,, July 16, 2007
[12] Steve Watson, Pro War Ads Falsely Link 9/11 To Iraq,, August 23, 2007
[13] Tim Gatto, If you Can't Handle The Truth, Don't Read This,, August 17, 2007
See all of these facts verified here:
9/11: Press for Truth, watch the movie here:
[14] Philip Giraldi, Can't Find Osama? Attack Iran Instead,, July 19, 2007. See also:
Harkavy, A Different 'Gut Feeling': Israel Attacking Iran,, July 13, 2007
Payvand News, Ex-CIA officer Slams US Allegations against Iran as Sham,, July 28, 2007, Antiwar Radio: Scott Horton Interviews Philip Giraldi, July 24, 2007:
“Former CIA counter-terrorism officer and columnist Philip Giraldi debunks the War Party’s claims that Iran backs al Qaeda.”
Larry Chin, Washington's Consensus Al Qaeda Deception: Al Qaeda: “stronger than ever”—or not?, July 19, 2007:
“The ‘war on terrorism’ is a foreign policy weapon favored by an elite and ironclad Anglo-American consensus, supported equally by Washington’s political factions. The surge of "Al-Qaeda" covert operations and "terrorism" propaganda over the past three weeks, and reports of “renewed Al-Qaeda power”, marks the beginning of intensified false flag deception.”
Larry Chin, Al-Qaeda, the eternal covert operation: British “terror” incident latest product of “war on terror” propaganda,, July 5, 2007
USA TODAY, New terror report harrowing or hype?, July 20, 2007
Walter C. Uhler, Lying Again, This Time About Iran's Nuclear Program,, August 9, 2007:
“…after noting that it was up to Iran to prove that it is a stabilizing force in the world, Bush proceeded to lie: ‘After all, this is a government that has proclaimed its desire to build a nuclear weapon.’ We can be sure that Bush lied, because virtually everyone, except for a few morons, knows that ‘the Iranian government has never articulated such a desire and in fact has repeatedly claimed, genuinely or disingenuously, the opposite.’ [Farideh Farhi, "Afghanistan, Iraq and the Bush Administration's Incoherent Iran Policy," Informed Comment Global Affairs, Aug. 7, 2007]”
[15] Arabesque, Keith Olbermann Updates The Nexus Of Terror And Politics - Creating Terror,, July 27, 2007
[16] Fox News, U.S. Terror Attack — 'Ninety Days at Most',, July 13, 2005
[17] This “new” article is reposted in 2007. The Fox article suspiciously has no date on it, but it is listed as “2005” on the printer friendly version.
See responses to this “August 2007” article. See also:
Jon Gold, Is Fox News Recycling Terror To Scare The Masses? 911blogger,, August 2, 2007:
“Earlier today, I posted this article from Fox News entitled, "U.S. Terror Attack — 'Ninety Days at Most." This particular story was picked up today by,, and As it turns out, this story was originally published by Fox News on 7/13/2005.”
[18] Philip Giraldi, Terrorists Are Everywhere,, July 31, 2007. See also:
Michael Ledeen, Time To Get Tough With Iran: Enough Diplomacy! Address Iran Before Another 9/11 Happens,, Feb. 1, 2007
[19] Jerry White, The motives behind the Bush administration’s latest terror scare,, July 27, 2007. See also:
Peter Hoekstra, Intel & Terror: Dems in Denial,, August 9, 2007
[20] Isabel Vincent, U.S. supported al-Qaeda cells during Balkan Wars: Fought Serbian Troops, National Post, March 15, 2002
[21] Michael Griffin, Reaping the Whirlwind: The Taliban Movement in Afghanistan (London: Pluto Press, 2001), 115. Exploration in the 1990s has considerably downgraded these estimates.
[22] Western governments and media apply the term “al Qaeda” to the whole “network of co-opted groups” who have at some point accepted leadership, training and financing from bin Laden (Jason Burke, Al-Qaeda: The True Story of Radical Islam [London: I.B. Tauris, 2004], 7-8). From a Muslim perceptive, the term “Al Qaeda” is clumsy, and has led to the targeting of a number of Islamist groups opposed to bin Laden’s tactics. See Montasser al-Zayyat, The Road to Al-Qaeda: The Story of Bin Lāden’s Right-Hand Man [London: Pluto Press, 2004], 100, etc.).
[23] Peter Dale Scott, 9/11 in Historical Perspective: Flawed Assumptions: Deep Politics: Drugs, Oil, Covert Operations and Terrorism, A briefing for Congressional staff, July 9, 2005
[24] Larisa Alexandrovna, On Cheney, Rumsfeld order, US outsourcing special ops, intelligence to Iraq terror group, intelligence officials say,, April 13, 2006
[25] Paul Joseph Watson & Steve Watson, U.S. Government Uses Al-Qaeda To Attack Iran,, May 28, 2007
[26] Ray McGovern, George W. Bush: A CIA Analysis, August 22, 2007
[27] Face The Nation: Dick Cheney, April 15, 2007. Listen to interview here: Transcript. See also:
National Intelligence Estimate, The Terrorist Threat to the US Homeland, July 2007:
“We assess that al-Qaida will continue to try to acquire chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear material in attacks and would not hesitate to use them if it develops what it deems a sufficient capability."
James Sterngold, Contingencies for nuclear terrorist attack: Government working up plan to prevent chaos in wake of bombing of major city,, May 11, 2007
Allison, Graham, No Loose Nukes: Preventing a Terrorist Nuclear Attack on the U.S., The Evening Bulletin, June 28, 2007
Graham T. Allison, How Likely is a Nuclear Terrorist Attack on the United States?, April 20, 2007
Steve Holland, Obama, Clinton in new flap, over nuclear weapons,, August 2, 2007
Associated Press, Pakistan Fires Back At Obama,, August 3, 2007.
Lynn Sweet, Sweet blog special: Nuke? No nuke? Obama works to define position. UPDATE. Dodd says Obama ‘confused.’, August 2, 2007
Philip Giraldi, Inside Track: Rudy’s New Foreign Policy Posse,, July 12, 2007:
“Giuliani—together with Mitt Romney and John McCain—has publicly advocated a military strike against Iran to keep it from acquiring nuclear weapons. He has also not ruled out the use of America’s own nuclear weapons if that should prove necessary to deter Tehran.”
Spencer Ackerman, Welcome Back to Summer 2001,, July 12:
“According to practically every available intelligence report, the summer of 2007 is eerily similar to the summer of 2001: numerous, compounding threats, without specificity, emanating from a souped-up al-Qaeda with save haven in South Asia.”
Abbas Edalat and Mehrnaz Shahabi, Armageddon prospects,, August 9, 2007:
“Last year John McCain, a Republican presidential hopeful and an advocate of keeping the military option against Iran on the table, was asked what the consequence of an attack on Iran would be. His response was only one word: ‘Armageddon.’”
Graham Allison, How to prevent an American Hiroshima,, July 20, 2007
[28] Brian Ross, Rhonda Schwartz, and Richard Esposito, Secret Document: U.S. Fears Terror 'Spectacular' Planned,, July 1, 2007
[29] Brian Ross, Rhonda Schwartz, and Richard Esposito, Secret Document: U.S. Fears Terror 'Spectacular' Planned
[30] E.A. Torriero, Chertoff's Gut, Chicago Tribune,, July 11 2007. See also:
'George Washington', Chertoff Predicts Simultaneous LA/San Francisco Dirty Bombs,, July 20, 2007:
"a 9/11 truther attended a talk which Homeland Security Head Michael Chertoff gave [July 20] at USC on port and supply-chain security and public infrastructure protection. The truther reported to me today by email that Chertoff spoke about more "gut feelings" he (Chertoff) has about a simultaneous Los Angeles / San Francisco dirty bomb attack that ‘our enemy is surely planning’."
Sean Howard, A "gut feeling" on homeland security: Government department is a waste of the country's money,, July 31, 2007
[31] Associated Press, Homeland General: Attack 'Could Happen Any Day',, July 24, 2007.
[32] Bill Gertz, Al Qaeda seen in search of nukes, July 26, 2007
[33] John McArdle, Capitol Police Boost Security to Deal With Threat of Pre-Sept. 11 Attack by al-Qaida,, August 2, 2007
[34] ABC news, Increased Security Produces as Many Questions as Answers,, August 3, 2007. See also:
Spencer Ackerman, Lott: Get Out of D.C. While You Still Can,, August 2, 2007
[35] Associated Press, Pakistan Fires Back At Obama,, August 3, 2007
[36] Kenneth R. Timmerman, Former CIA Director: Terrorist Strike Within U.S. Real Threat,, August 7, 2007. See also:
FamilySecurityMatters, Former CIA Director R. James Woolsey: Upcoming Terror Strike on U.S. 'Very Real’,, August 8, 2007
“Citizens take note: whatever Senators wanted to enforce FISA restrictions on the president in these circumstances should, in our humble opinion, be kicked out of office. We are not playing paddycake with terrorists who lust for our deaths. This is all out war and our “leaders” need to get serious but fast about winning it.”
[37] Marc Parent, $4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks,, August 26, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson, Market Crash Forecast Suggests New 9/11,, August 27, 2007
[38] Business News, US recession risk highest since 9/11: ex-Treasury secretary,, August 27, 2007
[39] 911blogger, THE KENNEBUNKPORT WARNING,, August 27, 2007
Note: see controversy here:
[40] Brian Ross and Rhonda Schwartz, Signal to Attack? Worries Over Latest al Qaeda Tape,, July 13, 2007
[41] Paul L. Williams, Chertoff's ‘Gut Feeling' Could Be a Nuclear Detonation,, July 16, 2007
[42] Krista Kjellman, U.S. Intel Chief: Tall Buildings and Mass Casualties Top AQ's Hit List,, July 20, 2007
[43] Brian Knowlton, Bush Insists Al Qaeda in Iraq Threatens U.S.,, July 24, 2007
[44] Dave Eberhart , CIA Bin Laden Chief: Next Attack ‘Bigger Than 9/11',, July 25, 2007
[45] Rhonda Schwartz, New Al Qaeda Web Ad Threatens 'Big Surprise',, August 1, 2007
[46] William Norman Grigg, Praying for a Terrorist Strike: The GOP's Newest Political Strategy,, July 11, 2007
[47] Ian Brockwell, 9/11 – Fool me once..., July 22, 2007. See also:
Ian Brockwell, Signs suggest new “9/11” imminent,, July 15, 2007:
“There has been considerable talk, this last week or so, about how a ‘new’ 9/11 would gain fresh support for the Bush administration’s ‘war on terror’.”
[48] Captain Eric H. May, A Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51),, August 6, 2007
[49] Angus Reid Global Monitor: Polls & Research, American Majority Expects Terrorist Attack,, July 24, 2007
[50] Webster Tarpley, The Next 9-11: Cheney Determined To Strike This Summer: Only Impeachment, Removal or General Strike Can Stop Him, July 21, 2007. See also:
Scholars for 9/11 Truth, GOP Welcomes New 9/11: Reports Lay Groundwork for Attack, Scholars Say,, August 3, 2007:
“A spate of new reports of al Qaida resurgence appears to be laying the foundation for a fake attack on the US to bolster support for the ‘war on terror’ and Bush's sagging political fortunes.”
[51] Aayers, Help Stop the Next 9/11,, July 27, 2007. See also:
Captain Eric H. May, Next 9/11, Summer, 2007?,, July 23, 2007
Captain Eric H. May, Peter DeFazio and the Portland Nuke,, July 27, 2007:
“As I pointed out in my column last week, Next 9/11, Summer 2007?, Operation Noble Resolve, to be conducted in August, will involve extensive mobilization of Homeland Security and U.S. military forces to simulate a wide range of catastrophic terror events in Oregon. The grand finale will be the simulation of a ten kiloton atomic bomb in Portland. But what if they decide to use a real bomb rather than simulate it?”
Captain Eric H. May, A Dawning Dictatorship? (911-2B & NSPD-51),, August 6, 2007
Aayers, An Updated Rewrite of: Noble Resolve 07: Four days of “simulated” nuclear terrorist scenarios in the US & Europe,, August 7, 2007
Aayers, HARVARD STUDY: 10K Nuke in Portland,, August 12, 2007:
“Operation Noble Resolve is a terror drill coming to Portland during August 20-24. There have been numerous articles and posts issued that warn of the possibility that the drill will turn into a false flag ‘live’ event involving a 10 K nuke.”
Captain Eric H. May, Staging the Portland Nuke (A Comedy of Terrors),, August 13, 2007, Oregon Truth Alliance Launches Site: Warns of False Flag Threat of Noble Resolve, August 13, 2007
[53] Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity & Dr. Justin Frank, Dangers of a Cornered George Bush,, July 27, 2007
[54] Editorial, Martialing our Constitution,, August 4, 2007:
“In May, the White House released what it called a National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive for how the federal government would respond to a ‘catastrophic emergency.’ This directive states that if the president determines that a catastrophic emergency has taken place—loosely defined as ‘any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy or government functions’—the president would have the power to take over all government functions until the emergency is declared over.’ In other words, a dictatorship.”
[55] John S. Koppel, Bush justice is a national disgrace,, July 5, 2007
[56] New York Times Editorial, Stampeding Congress, Again,, August 3, 2007
[57] Steve Watson, Bush Confirms He Will Seek More Dictatorial Power,, August 7, 2007. See also:
Steve Watson, The Timeline to Tyranny,, August 7, 2007:
“The top ten advances towards tyranny in the United States during the tenure of the Bush administration, from the Patriot Act to the latest expansion of the illegal eavesdropping surveillance program.”
[58] John Edwards, Edwards Rejects the "War on Terror",, May 2, 2007
[59] Philip Atkinson, Exclusive: Conquering the Drawbacks of Democracy, The Family Security Foundation, Inc.,, August 3, 2007 [embarrassing article removed from internet—see below]
Marc Parent, Group that advocated Bush become "President-for-Life" linked to Bush Administration itself,, August 16, 2007:
“Well, it turns out that "Family Security Matters (FSM) is a front group for the Center for Security Policy (CSP), a conservative Washington think tank ‘committed to the time-tested philosophy of promoting international peace through American strength.’ (The phone number listed on the FSM website is answered by the CSP.) So now we are led to the Center for Security Policy, and who's connected to that group? Dick Cheney, Vice President of the U.S. under George W. Bush, was an early member of Center's Board of Advisors (which is now called the National Security Advisory Council).”
Paul Joseph Watson, Neo-Cons: Make Bush Dictator Of The World,, August 17, 2007
[60] Judicial Watch, Maps and Charts of Iraqi Oil Fields,, July 17, 2003
[61] Project Censored, Secrets of Cheney's Energy Task Force Come to Light,, Top 25: 2006 Censored Stories
[62] Warren P. Strobel, Cheney urging strikes on Iran,, August 9, 2007
[63] Philip Giraldi, Deep Background, The American Conservative,, August 1, 2005. See also:
Manuel Valenzuela, Of Crazies, Neocons and the Enemy Within,, June 13, 2007
[64] Raw Story, The Build Up To Iran Timeline,, January 25, 2007. See also:
Alexandrovna and Muriel Kane, Escalation of US Iran military planning part of six-year Administration push,, January 23, 2007
[65] Raw Story, Intelligence officials doubt Iran uranium claims, say Cheney receiving suspect briefings,, August 18, 2006
[66] Michel Chossudovsky, Bush Directive for a "Catastrophic Emergency" in America: Building a Justification for Waging War on Iran?, June 24, 2007
[67] Joshua Frank, Another Step Toward War With Iran: Democrats as Leviathans,, July 19th, 2007
[68] Philip Giraldi, Accusations Pave Way for Assault on Iran,, June 13, 2007
[69] Philip Giraldi, Avoiding War With Iran,, July 10, 2007
[70] Stephen Kinzer, The new drumbeat on Iran, The Guardian, July 11, 2007
[71] Pat Buchanan, Tonkin Gulf II and the Guns of August?, July 16, 2007
[72] Ewen MacAskill and Julian Borger, Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran, The Guardian, July 16, 2007
[73] Abbas Edalat and Mehrnaz Shahabi, Prospects of Armageddon: The Logic That Defends Past Nuclear Atrocities Is Now Used To Support a Strike Against Iran,, August 7, 2007
[74] Warren P. Strobel, Cheney urging strikes on Iran,, August 9, 2007
[75] Robert Baer, Prelude to an Attack on Iran,, August 18, 2007
[76] Associated Press, Karl Rove to leave White House at month's end: Bush’s close friend, chief political strategist is latest senior official to resign,, August 13, 2007
[77] Karen Kwiatkowski, What Will Clueless and Hopeless Do Next?, August 20, 2007
[78] Ray McGovern, George W. Bush: A CIA Analysis,, August 22, 2007
[79] Scott Horton, The Next War Draws Nearer,, August 23, 2007
[80] Paul Joseph Watson, Ron Paul: Iran Attack On Within A Year: Presidential candidate says Neo-Cons waiting for right opportunity,, August 28, 2007
[81] Think Progress, Bolton: I ‘Absolutely’ Hope The U.S. Will Attack Iran In The Next ‘Six Months’,, August 22, 2007
[82] Larisa Alexandrovna, CIA said to step up operations against Iran as hawks seek to tie Iraq bombs to Tehran,, August 24, 2007
[83] Scott Peterson, An intensifying US campaign against Iran,, August 24, 2007
[84] Yahoo News, Middle East turmoil could cause world war: U.S. envoy,, August 27, 2007
[85] Patrick J. Buchanan, Has Bush Boxed Himself In?, August 28, 2007
[86] Charles Bremner, Sarkozy talks of bombing if Iran gets nuclear arms,, August 28, 2007
[87] Robin Wright, Iranian Unit to Be Labeled 'Terrorist',, August 15, 2007
[88] Congressman Dennis Kucinich, Administration’s Terrorist Labeling Is A Calculated Plan To Set the Stage For War With Iran,, August 15, 2007
[89] Sheldon Alberts, 'Terrorist' label means U.S. set for Iran attack, experts say, Ottawa Citizen, August 16, 2007
[90] Warren P. Strobel and Nancy A. Youssef, U.S. actions against Iran raise war risk, many fear,, August 17, 2007
[91] Kaveh L Afrasiabi, US steps closer to war with Iran,, Aug 18, 2007
[92] Larisa Alexandrovna, CIA said to step up operations against Iran as hawks seek to tie Iraq bombs to Tehran,, August 24, 2007. See also:
Kurt Nimmo, Neocons One Step Closer to Attacking Iran,, August 26, 2007
[93] Tehran Times, Iraq failure leaves U.S. looking for scapegoats: Iran, August 28, 2007
[94] Thomas Harding, British exit from Iraq will be 'ugly': US adviser,, August 20, 2007. See also:
Karim Jamil, Basra readies itself for British troop pull-out,, August 26, 2007:
“After four and a half inconclusive years of fighting, British forces are to pull out from their last base in the oil port of Basra and trust their Iraqi comrades to take their place.”
[95] WILLIAM LOWTHER, War of words: British generals tell Brown to pull out of Iraq, US says stay,, August 20, 2007
[96] Zbigniew Brzezinski, Testimony before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, February 1, 2007 See also:
Webster Tarpley, The Next 9-11: Cheney Determined To Strike This Summer: Only Impeachment, Removal or General Strike Can Stop Him:
“Over the past half year, events have followed Brzezinski’s scenario closely. Blaming Iran for the missed benchmarks in Iraq is now the daily stock in trade of the Bush administration and the US Central Command, who whine continuously about Iranian interference in Iraq. There have been several military provocations in Iraq which the US has tried to pin on Iran… That leaves us with Brzezinski’s third scenario point: a terrorist act in the US blamed on Iran. What Brzezinski is talking about here is high treason, insurrection, genocide, high crimes against humanity under US law and the Nuremberg Code. Why has he not been called upon to tell all he knows about this sinister plot, so obviously operating through the Cheney-Addington office, and through Eliot Abrams at the White House? Because the Democrats who heard that warning Senators Biden, Dodd, and Obama on the committee, plus Hillary Clinton have done nothing to raise a hue and cry, hold hearings, issue subpoenas, demand documents, or begin impeachment hearings against those involved. The Democratic Party must therefore be seen as fully complicit under the Nuremberg Code in any future crimes by Cheney regarding a wider war in the Middle East.”
[97] Paul Joseph Watson, Sheehan: Distinct Chance Of Staged Attack, Martial Law,, July 12, 2007
[98] Hon. Ron Paul of Texas, Before the U.S. House of Representatives, Escalation is Hardly the Answer, January 11, 2007
[99] Associated Press, Castro suggests Washington fails to stop attacks on US soil to justify war on terror, Herald Tribune, July 15, 2007
[100] Paul Craig Roberts, Impeach now Or Face the End of Constitutional Democracy,, July 17, 2007. See also:
(RIA Novosti), White House preparing to stage new September 11 - Reagan official,, July 20, 2007.
Joe Crubaugh, 10 False Flags that Changed the World,
[101] Mike Green, Deception: The Dangerous Politics of the Left and Right,, August 2, 2007
[102] Larisa Alexandrovna, CIA said to step up operations against Iran as hawks seek to tie Iraq bombs to Tehran,, August 24, 2007. See also:
Kurt Nimmo, Neocons One Step Closer to Attacking Iran,, August 26, 2007
[103] Patrick J. Buchanan, Has Bush Boxed Himself In?, August 28, 2007
[104] Rick Moran, Are Conservatives Really Hoping For Another 9/11?, July 17, 2007
Roger Simon, Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win,, April 24, 2007
Roger Simon, Giuliani 9/11 remark draws angry reply,, April 25, 2007
Craig Chamberlain, It is Time to Stop Investing in Terror,, August 4, 2007:
“We should stop investing our money into companies that do business with terrorist states. Yet Congress has done nothing about this. Could it be that it is because 36 members of Congress invest in companies that do business with terrorist states?”
[105] Max Boot, Necessary Roughness, Council on Foreign Relations,, January 20, 2005
[106] John Yoo, Go on the Offensive Against Terror, Los Angeles Times, July 13, 2005
[107] Ann Scott Tyson, New Plans Foresee Fighting Terrorism Beyond War Zones,, April 23, 2006
[108] Ann Wright, "I Hope It's Your Family Members That Die",, April 25, 2007
[109] FOX Attacks Iran Transcript,
[110] Andrew Chung, Why military might does not always win,, July 8, 2007
[111] Josh Catone, Arkansas GOP head: We need more 'attacks on American soil' so people appreciate Bush,, June 3, 2007
[112] The Hugh Hewitt Show, Former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum on his former colleagues' increasing lack of resolve on the war, Transcript, See also:
Paul Joseph Watson, Santorum Suggest New Terror Attacks Will Change View Of War,, July 8, 2007
[113] Stu Bykofsky, To save America, we need another 9/11,, August 9, 2007. See also:
News Hounds, John Gibson hosts Stu Bykofsky to defend "we need another 9/11" column,, YouTube Video, Gibson brings on Stu Bykofsky to defend column,, August 10, 2007
Prison Planet, Fox News Still Runs Defense For "Need Another 9/11" Columnist,, August 12, 2007:
“John ‘The Albino Vampire’ Gibson all but agrees with Neo-Con slug columnist Stu Bykofsky that America needs another 9/11 to defeat the terrorists. That's right - we need more terror or the terrorists will win!”
[114] Michelle Malkin, No, we don’t need another 9/11,, August 10, 2007
[115] Steven Levitt, If You Were a Terrorist, How Would You Attack?, August 8, 2007
[116] Doug Thompson, GOP memo touts new terror attack as way to reverse party's decline, Capitol Hill Blue, Nov 10, 2005
[117] CNN, Transcript, Transition of Power: President-Elect Bush Meets With Congressional Leaders on Capitol Hill,, December 18, 2000
[118] Paul Craig Roberts, My wake-up call: Watch for another 9/11-WMD experience, Online Journal,, July 20, 2007. See also:
Muriel Kane, Old-line Republican warns 'something's in the works' to trigger a police state,, July 19, 2007
Dave Lindorff, Martial law threat is real,, July 31, 2007:
“This is all sitting around like a loaded gun waiting to go off. I think the risk of martial law is trivial right now, but the minute there is a terrorist attack, then it is real. And it stays with us after Bush and Cheney are gone, because terrorism stays with us forever.”
Kaleem Omar, Bush’s Critics Say Threat of Martial Law in The United States is ‘Real’,, July 29, 2007
[119] Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis, Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?, July 30, 2007
[120] Bob Feuer, Congressman John Olver Believes Bush Will Cancel 2008 Elections, Still Refuses to Support Impeaching Him or Cheney,, July 5, 2007. See also:
Webster Tarpley, The Next 9-11: Cheney Determined To Strike This Summer: Only Impeachment, Removal or General Strike Can Stop Him:
"A few days ago, a group of lawyers from western Massachusetts met with the local congressman, Democrat John Olver. Their request was that Olver take part in the urgent effort to impeach Bush and Cheney. Olver responded by saying that he had no intention of doing anything to support impeachment. He went further, offering the information that the United States would soon attack Iran, and that these hostilities would be followed by the imposition of a martial law regime here."
[121] John W. Whitehead, The Instruments of Tyranny,, August 4, 2007
[122] Joe Kay, Bush’s assertion of executive power: The logic of presidential-military dictatorship,, July 16, 2007
[123] Prison Planet, Secret FEMA Plan To Use Pastors as Pacifiers in Preparation For Martial Law,, May 24, 2006
[124] KSLA News 12, Homeland Security Enlists Clergy to Quell Public Unrest if Martial Law Ever Declared,, August 23, 2007. See also:
Paul Joseph Watson, Feds Train Clergy To "Quell Dissent" During Martial Law,, August 16, 2007
[125], Asleep at the Wheel: Press ignores congressional OK for martial law,, July 5, 2007
[126] News, Local Troops Deploy To Nation's Capital,, August 22, 2007
[127] Access denied: A Register-Guard Editorial, Register-Guard, July 23, 2007
[128] Jeff Kosseff, Congressman Denied Access To Post-Attack Continuity Plans, Newhouse News Service,, July 24, 2007
[129] Ibid. See also:
Charles Pope, Government is overzealous with secrecy, Reichert says,, July 25, 2007:
“’The problem is that the vice president and some other law enforcement and security agencies believe that they should decide which information they can keep secret, regardless of the law, the rules or what the needs are of our local law enforcement community,’ Harman told Leonard, the office's director, during the June 28 hearing.”
[130] Marty Kaplan, After the Next 9/11, July 29, 2007,
[131] White House, National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive,, May 9, 2007
[132] Lee Rogers, Bush To Be Dictator In A Catastrophic Emergency,, May 21, 2007. See also:
Joe Gandelman, ‘Big Surprise’ Promised By Al Qaeda In Web Ad,, August 1, 2007:
“There are already some on the left and right warning about new emergency plan that would go into effect after a terrorist attack that would essentially put the executive wing in charge of the entire government.”
[133] Larry Chin, New presidential directive gives Bush dictatorial power: National Security & Homeland Security Presidential Directive establishes ‘National Continuity Policy’,, May 21, 2007
[134] Kurt Nimmo, Bush Pens Dictatorship Directive, Few Notice,, May 30, 2007
[135] Daniel Ellsberg, Video Webcast: The day after the next 9/11 our Freedoms are Gone,, June 9, 2006:
“Daniel Ellsberg, the State Department official and Vietnam War Veteran who leaked 7,000 hand Xeroxed top secret ‘The Pentagon Papers’ to The New York Times 30 years ago, is urging those within the Administration who have knowledge of secret war plans to do as he did and leak. leak. leak.” See also:
Toby Harnden, Congressman causes controversy by comparing Bush to Hitler,, July 17, 2007
"[The 9/11 attacks were] almost like the Reichstag fire, kind of reminds me of that. After the Reichstag was burned, they blamed the Communists for it, and it put the leader [Hitler] of that country in a position where he could basically have authority to do whatever he wanted."
[136] The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. See also:
Joe Kay, Bush’s assertion of executive power: The logic of presidential-military dictatorship,, July 16, 2007
[137] James M. Cypher, From Military Keynesianism to Global-Neoliberal Militarism,, June 2007
[138] Muriel Kane, Old-line Republican warns 'something's in the works' to trigger a police state,, July 19, 2007. See also:
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Bush Executive Order: Criminalizing the Antiwar Movement,, July 20, 2007
[139] Benjamin H. Friedman and Harvey M. Sapolsky, You Never Know(ism),, Spring 2006
[140] Larry Chin, Al-Qaeda, the eternal covert operation: British “terror” incident latest product of “war on terror” propaganda,, July 5, 2007:
“It is a well-established and deliberately unaddressed historical fact that the CIA created “radical Islam” and Islamic “terrorism” during the Cold War. It is also a documented fact that the US, its allies, and their intelligence agencies (CIA, Pakistan’s ISI, Britain’s MI-6, etc.) have -- from the 1970s to the present day -- continued to use and guide terrorist groups, including “Al-Qaeda,” as intelligence and propaganda assets. “Islamic terrorism” is a manufactured weapon of Western geostrategy, serving Anglo-American interests.”
[141] Prof. Michel Chossudovsky, Bush Directive for a ‘Catastrophic Emergency’ in America: Building a Justification for Waging War on Iran? See also:
Michel Chossudovsky, The Pentagon’s Second 9/11: ‘Another [9/11] attack could create both a justification and an opportunity to retaliate against some known targets’, August 10, 2006
[142] Scott Ritter, Why Cheney Really Is That Bad,, August 21, 2007
[143] AFP, Much of US favors Bush impeachment: poll,, July 6, 2007
[144] Bruce Fein, Impeach Cheney: The vice president has run utterly amok and must be stopped., June 27, 2007. See also:
Andrew Bard Schmookler, The Bruce Fein Interview,, 18 July 2007
“Everything in life is a matter of degree, and while FDR, Nixon, McCarthyism, and Clinton were occasionally lawless, Bush is systematically so. Thus he is the greater danger. The rule of law can survive a beating once every five or ten years; it cannot survive beatings every five or ten minutes.”
Richard Ross, Fear of terror threatens defense of freedom,, August 7, 2007
Chris Floyd, The Legal Pervert's Parade: Executive Privilege Über Alles,, July 20, 2007
[145] Marjorie Cohn, Reining In an Out-of-Control Executive,, July 16, 2007
[146] Sen. Russ Feingold, Congress has a duty to censure President for his abuses of power,, August 14, 2007
[147] Carol Wolman, Congress: Bottleneck to impeachment,, August 13, 2007
[148] Ted Lang, Immediate Impeachment: The Only Way Out and Back!, July 23, 2007
[149] Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity & Dr. Justin Frank, Dangers of a Cornered George Bush
[150] Butler Shaffer, Why They Won’t Impeach,, July 17, 2007
[151] Resources and Bibliography
[152] Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice,
9/11 Research,
9/11 Blogger,
[153] William Rodriguez, The Heroism of William Rodriguez: Amazing Testimony from Inside the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11, transcript of William Rodriguez’s presentation at the American Scholars Symposium, June 25, 2006.
Posted by Arabesque at 7:29 PM
Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Links to this post
Kennebunkport Warning Cartoon: We are Funded by the Ford ...
Not a bad likeness, although my girlfriend says my chin isn’t as long. One thing for sure, they got my cheap sunglasses! For a background on the ongoing attacks on me, Cosmos, Arabesque, and Col. Jenny Sparks, be sure and read my essay, ...
Posted byMichael atSeptember 28, 2007 8:19 PM
Kennebunkport Warning Cartoon: We are Funded by the Ford ...
Kennebunkport Warning Cartoon: We are Funded by the Ford Foundation Because we Oppose Divisive Language? By Arabesque In yet another strange twist in the Kennebunkport Warning Controversy, a professional-quality cartoon suggests that ...
Posted byArabesque atSeptember 25, 2007 12:18 PM
A Message for Webster Tarpley and the Supporters of the ...
A Message for Webster Tarpley and the Supporters of the Kennebunkport Warning: It’s About the Divisiveness By Arabesque The Kennebunkport Warning has been a source of much controversy. In examining the divisive behavior surrounding the ...
Posted byArabesque atSeptember 21, 2007 1:33 PM
Webster Tarpley: Arabesque, Cosmos, Jenny Sparks, Jon Gold ...
Webster Tarpley: Arabesque, Cosmos, Jenny Sparks, Jon Gold, Michael Wolsey, and Truthaction are “disinfo” By Arabesque. A comprehensive summary of the slander, disinformation, ad-hominem attacks, threats, and accusations by supporters ...
Posted byArabesque atSeptember 8, 2007 7:15 PM
The CIA and Al-Qaeda Link
“Al Qaeda is a creation and a tool of our own CIA. The CIA through the Pakistani Intelligence Bureau called the ISI funds it. The facts are that we wired $100000.00 to ISI that has links to al Qaeda . In late September 2001 there was an ...
Posted byresistrevolt atSeptember 7, 2007 11:11 PM
Arabesque: 9/11 Truth: The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda ...
Arabesque: 9/11 Truth: The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, and After the Attack.
Posted byEditor atSeptember 5, 2007 4:08 PM
The Kennebunkport Train Wreck: Leadership? What Leadership?
[UPDATED below] The train wreck occasioned by "The Kennebunkport Warning Hoax Controversy" continues to reverberate, and the wreckage still hasn't stopped crumbling. But even amid the trembling ruins of what was supposed to be a Unified ...
Posted byWinter Patriot atSeptember 4, 2007 7:06 AM
Dissident Dissent: Paranoid Lunatics Vs. Conspiracy Theorists, Again!
In the week since the Kennebunkport Warning was signed, most of the discussion has concerned the controversy over who signed or did not sign it. Let's look at the text again. I've taken the liberty of inserting some space: ...
Posted byWinter Patriot atSeptember 1, 2007 11:44 PM
The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax?
The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax? By Arabesque. August 31, 2007. Updated: September 9, 2007. See also: The Kennebunkport Warning Controversy: A Study in Divisive Accusations, Insults, and Ad-Hominem Attacks ...
Posted byArabesque atSeptember 1, 2007 9:14 PM
The Kennebunkport Warning Hoax
The Kennebunkport Warning Hoax By Arabesque. August 31, 2007. Like most, I first believed that the Kennebunkport Warning was legitimate and that the signatures were legitimate. We now have very strong evidence it is a hoax. ...
Posted byMichael atSeptember 1, 2007 8:20 AM
The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, and After the Attack
The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, and After the Attack: “The whole mystique of intelligence is that you acquire this… very valuable information covertly… if truth be told, about 80%—eight, zero—of any of the information ...
Posted byArabesque atAugust 27, 2007 12:57 PM
Market Crash Forecast Suggests New 9/11
A mystery trader has risked losing around $1 billion dollars by placing 245000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, leading many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style catastrophe could ...
Posted byArabesque atAugust 27, 2007 11:02 AM
Writings by Arabesque
Articles by Arabesque. 9/11 Truth: An Introduction. Scientific Method versus Political Method: The US administration and its interpretation of the events of 9/11. No Speculation Required: 9/11 Was an Inside Job. The Next 9/11? ...
Posted byArabesque atAugust 1, 2007 10:28 AM
No Speculation Required: 9/11 Was an Inside Job
No Speculation Required: 9/11 Was an Inside Job. “If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers.” - Thomas Pynchon, Jr. By Arabesque. Speculation is one of the favorite pastimes among those who ...
Posted byArabesque atJuly 31, 2007 12:18 PM
Create a Link
Newer Post Older Post Home
Arabesque: 9/11 Truth
A Blog Devoted to Discussing 9/11 News, Research, and Disinformation

"When we act, we create our own reality"
“The aide said that guys like me were ‘in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who ‘believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.’ I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ‘That's not the way the world really works anymore… We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality.'"
Ron Suskind, Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush, New York Times, October 17, 2004

Writings by Arabesque
9/11 Truth: An Introduction
Scientific Method versus Political Method: The US administration and its interpretation of the events of 9/11
Iraq, 9/11 and Oil
No Speculation Required: 9/11 Was an Inside Job
Paul Thompson's Complete 9/11 Timeline: A Short Review
The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, and After the Attack
The World Trade Center
The World Trade Center Building Designers: Pre-9/11 claims strongly implicate that the Towers should have remained standing on 9/11
The Heroism of William Rodriguez: Amazing Testimony from Inside the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11
The Pentagon
Pentagon Flight Path Misinformation, Stand-Down, War Games, and the Three Mysterious Planes
A Critical Review of ‘The PentaCon - Smoking Gun Version’
9/11 and the Pentagon Attack: What Eyewitnesses Described
The Pentagon Eyewitness Testimony
The Pentagon Honey Pot
The NIST Report
Top 10 reasons why the NIST report is absurd
9/11, NIST, and “Bush Science”
Journal of 9/11 Studies Articles
‘Thermite Hypothesis’ versus ‘Controlled Demolition Hypothesis’: a response to ‘The Scientific Method Applied to the Thermite Hypothesis’
Letters in response to Judy Wood’s Directed Energy Weapon Hypothesis
9/11 Disinformation and Misinformation: Definitions and Examples
The Kennebunkport Warning Controversy: A Study in Divisive Accusations, Insults, and Ad-Hominem Attacks
9/11 Truth and Division: Disinformation, Agent Provocateurs, and False Adversaries
9/11 Truth: Dialog, False Adversaries, and Civility
History Channel - 9/11 Conspiracies, Fact or Fiction? A Review
The 9/11 Plane Theories and the “Conspiracy Theory Method”
Dr. Wood Interviewed by Greg Jenkins
Wood’s Request for correction to NIST: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Praise and Disdain for Arabesque: 9/11 Truth
“I would like to take a moment to mention and thank some researchers and activists who have made careful, unique and meaningful contributions to the effort to expose the role of mis- and disinformation in the 9/11 community… Arabesque [has] contributed numerous unique and comprehensive analytical essays and addresses the key logical errors and fallacies surrounding techniques often associated with the false claims.” Victoria Ashley, 9/11 Research"Arabesque has a blog devoted to discussing 9/11 news research and disinformation, and I think the disinformation department is absolutely admirable. He seems to have all the disinformation you could want. He's pushing it and peddling it on this sleazy, smelly” — Webster Tarpley, Author of 9/11: Synthetic Terror, and the Kennebunkport Warning ControversyPraise for Arabesque: 9/11 Truth

Blogs and Articles by Arabesque9/11 Truth: Essential Reading

Blog Archive
2007 (98)
October (7)
The Kennebunkport Warning Controversy Reviewed
Cosmos and Truth Revolution Radio: October 15, 200...
Cosmos on his radio show: Truth Action Radio: Sept...
Webster Tarpley: Arabesque, Cosmos, Jenny Sparks, ...
George Washington: Everything You Need to Know abo...
9/11 Truth and Division: Disinformation, Agent Pro...
9/11 Truth: Dialog, False Adversaries, and Civilit...
September (11)
Paul Thompson's Complete 9/11 Timeline: A Short Re...
9/11 Truth Leader on Disinformation and Infiltrati...
A Response to Winter Patriot about the Kennebunkpo...
Kennebunkport Warning Cartoon: We are Funded by th...
A Message for Webster Tarpley and the Supporters o...
Still more on the Kennebunkport Warning
Michael Wolsey and Launches News...
In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of The 9/11...
Another former government official calls for new 9...
The Latest on the Kennebunkport Warning Controvers...
The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax?
August (20)
The Kennebunkport Warning: Hoax?
The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, an...
Market Crash Forecast Suggests New 9/11
Iraq, 9/11 and Oil
University of Massachusetts Professor Calls For Ne...
History Channel - 9/11 Conspiracies, Fact or Ficti...
Robert Fisk: Even I question the 'truth' about 9/1...
Family Security Matters Advocates Bush become ‘Pre...
History Channel Hit Piece: Dirty Tricks, Malicious...
Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls...
A new article by Cheney biographer Stephen Hayes d...
Interview With John Schroeder, FDNY
Bush Confirms He Will Seek More Dictatorial Power
The Timeline to Tyranny
Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case ...
The Next 9/11? Predictions, Propaganda, Motive, an...
“We're an empire now, and when we act, we create o...
Former Reagan Official: Bush May Stage False Flag ...
Analyst: Al-Qaeda Videotapes Digitally Doctored
Writings by Arabesque
July (24)
No Speculation Required: 9/11 Was an Inside Job
The Pentagon Honey Pot
Keith Olbermann Updates The Nexus Of Terror And Po...
September 11th Advocates: Uphold the Constitution ...
Why Did the World’s Most Advanced Electronics Warf...
The 9/11 Plane Theories and the “Conspiracy Theory...
Castro suggests Washington fails to stop attacks o...
Pentagon Flight Path Misinformation, Stand-Down, W...
Congressman Denied Access To Federal Post-Terror A...
McCain Loses It and Flees After 9/11 Truth Questio...
Janeane Garofalo Blurts "9/11 Was an Inside Job" o...
Bush Administration Official Thought WTC Towers We...
June (13)
May (21)
April (1)
March (1)

'Education Drains the Swamp'
“What’s needed is politically relevant education. Education about agents of all kinds, especially
agents provocateurs, their history, who employs them, their tactics… While educating ourselves and others we can simultaneously actively combat agents of the state by refraining from engaging in the types of behaviour they employ to sow dissention: name-calling, rumour-mongering, insinuation... Refraining from this does not stifle vigorous discussion and debate, based on observable facts, statements and patterns. Education drains the swamp.”
Canadian Journalist Barrie Zwicker on Disinformation

9/11 Films/Documentaries
9/11: Press for Truth
Improbable Collapse
9/11 The Myth and the Reality
9/11 Mysteries

9/11 Blogs
George Washington's Blog
Visibility 9/11
The Frustrating Fraud
Col. Jenny Sparks
Crimes of the State

9/11 Links
9/11 Research
Journal of 9/11 Studies
Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice
Truth Action: 9/11 Truth Now
Visibility 9/11
9/11 Proof
Patriots Question 9/11
9/11 Blogger
Pilots for 9/11 Truth
9/11 Disinformation

11th Day of the Month Campaign (1)
9/11 (45)
9/11 Commission Report (1)
9/11 Conspiracy Theory (1)
9/11 Cover-up (2)
9/11 Debunkers (3)
9/11 Family Members (2)
9/11 First Responders (2)
9/11 Foreknowledge (3)
9/11 Justice (1)
9/11 Questions (3)
9/11 Was an Inside Job (1)
911Blogger (5)
911Researchers (1)
Ad-Hominem (6)
Afghanistan (1)
Agent Provocateur (4)
Air Defenses (1)
Al Qaeda (2)
Alberto Gonzales (2)
Alex Jones (5)
Animation (1)
Anomalies (1)
Arabesque (10)
Arabesque: 9/11 Truth Writings (1)
Big Tent (2)
Bill Doyle (1)
Bob McIlvaine (1)
Bruce Marshall (1)
Building Designers (1)
Bush (9)
Bush Science (1)
C-130 (1)
Cancelled Elections (1)
Cartoon (2)
Caustic Logic (3)
Chip Berlet (1)
CIA (4)
Cindy Sheehan (5)
Civil Liberties (2)
Civility (1)
CNN (1)
Complete 9/11 Timeline (1)
Conan O'Brien (1)
Conspiracy (2)
Conspiracy Theory Method (1)
Constitution (1)
Continuity of Government (2)
Controlled Demolition (9)
Cosmos (5)
Creating Our Own Reality (2)
Crimes of the State (1)
Cuba (1)
Dahlia Wasfi (1)
Dan Abrahamson (1)
Dan Govatos (1)
David Addington (1)
David Ray Griffin (3)
David Shayler (1)
Death Threats (1)
Democracy (1)
Department of Justice (1)
DEW (3)
Dick Cheney (6)
Dictatorship (3)
Directed Energy Weapons (3)
Dirty Bomb (1)
Disinformation (29)
Dust (1)
E-4B (2)
Ellen Mariani (1)
Explosions (4)
eyewitness testimony (5)
Fake Terrorism (3)
False Flag Attack (2)
Family Security Matters (1)
FBI (1)
Fear mongering (2)
Fidel Castro (1)
Firefighters (1)
Flight 11 (1)
Flight 175 (1)
Flight 77 (2)
Flight Path (1)
Ford Foundation (1)
General Mahmoud Ahmad (1)
George Tenet (1)
George Washingon (5)
Giuliani (3)
Global Guardian (2)
Greg Jenkins (3)
Hell (1)
History Channel (2)
Hoax (1)
Honey Pot (1)
Humor (1)
Incompetence (1) (2)
Inside Job (1)
Insider Trading (2)
Inspector General (1)
IntelCenter (1)
Iran (2)
Iraq (3)
Iron-rich Spheres (2)
ISI (1)
James Bennett (1)
Janeane Garofalo (1)
Jenny Sparks (4)
Jerry Lobdill (1)
Jersey Girls (1)
Jim Fetzer (7)
Jim Hoffman (4)
Joe Biden (1)
John Albanese (1)
John Doraemi (1)
John Koppel (1)
John McCain (1)
John Negroponte (1)
John Schroeder (1)
John Skilling (1)
Jon Gold (1)
Journal of 9/11 Studies (7)
Judicial Watch (1)
Judy Wood (5)
Keith Olbermann (1)
Kennebunkport Warning (11)
Kevin Barrett (1)
Kevin Ryan (8)
Kissinger (1)
Laurie Wanwell (1)
Leslie Robertson (1)
Loose Change (2)
Lying (1)
Lyndon LaRouche (1)
Lynn Margulis (1)
Mainstream Media Propaganda (6)
Mark Gaffney (1)
Matt Lepacek (1)
Media (2)
Michael C. Ruppert (1)
Michael Chertoff (2)
Michael Moore (1)
Michael Wolsey (6)
Military Commissions Act (1)
Misinformation (7)
Mohammed Atta (1)
Molten Metal (3)
Morgan Reynolds (3)
New 9/11 (4)
NIST (7)
No Plane Theory (3)
Norman Mineta (2)
ns (1)
Oil (2)
Omar Saeed Sheikh (1)
Osama Bin Laden (2)
Pakistan (1)
Passenger List (1)
Patriot Act (1)
Patriots Question 9/11 (1)
Paul Craig Roberts (1)
Paul Thompson (1)
PentaCon (2)
Pentagon (9)
Pentagon Eyewitness Testimony (4)
Peter DeFazio (1)
Pilots for 9/11 Truth (3)
Plane (2)
Police State (1)
Political Method (1)
Porter Goss (1)
Presidential Directive (1)
Prison Planet (3)
Psyop (1)
Purdue (1)
Put Options (1)
Ray McGovern (1)
Report (1)
Research (1)
Richard Gage (1)
Rick Siegel (1)
Rob Balsamo (1)
Robert Fisk (1)
Ron Paul (1)
Rosie O'Donnel (1)
Scaffold (1)
Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (5)
Scientific Method (3)
Screw Loose Change (2)
September 11th Advocates (1)
Sicko (1)
Simpsons (1)
Simulation (1)
Special Pleading (1)
Speculation (1)
Stand Down (3)
Stephen Hayes (1)
Steve Koeppel (1)
Steven Jones (11)
Stock Market Crash (1)
Straw-man Fallacy (1)
Superthermite (1)
Terror Alerts (1)
Terrorists (1)
The View (1)
Thermate (5)
Thermite (6)
Truthaction (2)
Truthmove (2)
USA Patriot Act (1)
USGS (1)
Vancouver 9/11 Conference (1)
Victoria Ashley (1)
Video (2)
Vietnam War (1)
Visibility 911 (1)
War Game Exercise (2)
We Are Change (1)
We're an Empire Now (2)
Webster Tarpley (8)
What Really Happened (1)
White House (1)
William Rodriguez (2)
Winter Patriot (1)
Wiretapping (1)
World Trade Center (16)
WTC 7 (3)
WTC Eyewitness Testimony (3)

About Me

9/11 Blogger, Writer, and Researcher View my complete profile

Ah and Blackwater as well, the fundamentalist "Christian" group who kill for their Gawd worldwide.